I'm not talking about Picasaweb (which I also used, but was killed off awhile back). I would pay for an updated fully-functional Picasa, or software that does what it did. I have a feeling that those who criticize Picasa didn't use it the way I did.in combination with Photoshop, Picasa was, and in some ways, remains.excellent. Google is finally killing off Picasa's functionality as far as living in the space between desktop and cloud-as of a couple of days ago it became impossible to sign into my gmail account from within Picasa. My go-to desktop do-it-all for all things photos, though, has been, for years.Picasa. I am a reasonably competent user of Photoshop (CS3, to be precise). Geotagging - I've not used this - no idea what issues there would be with migrating metadata.Īs far as your file structures are concerned you might have to do more work in keeping track of directories (unless you choose a full fledged library application like LightRoom. Facial recognition data are stored in the image files (provided you have that option set in Picasa) but I'm not aware of other viewers which make use of it. In this case the changes will be applied to your files and would migrate to any new viewer. Edit changes (like Fill Light or Cropping) are stored in proprietary Picasa metadata (and would be difficult to migrate) unless you are saving the images in Picasa. You can view them with a program like Irfanview but the implementation is not nearly as elegant as PicasaįastStone doesn't recognize captions or tags but you could move them to the Comment tag in which case they would be visible. Captions and Tags you create in Picasa are stored within your image files. Here is my understanding of the Picasa metadata and the issues in migration (I would welcome corrections and additions from others): Would any of the replacement tools mentioned be able to takeover my file structures and meta datas without any major overhaul? Easy enough to manage, as I rarely need to access old exports. I also transferred the Picasa export folders, the only complication being that the fresh installation of Picasa made a new export folder for new work. Picasa is still very much alive and well.Ībout a year ago, I merged image files from two computers, putting all the various folders under "My Photos". Once the Picasa "save" icon is clicked all editing goes back to Windows Pictures and FastStone. In a dozen years I have had no problems with Picasa which is my go to photo software. It's free and although a bit more tedious to use it does very well for basic file and editing work. Sigh, can't hold your breath with technologies. Would any of the replacement tools mentioned be able to takeover my file structures and meta datas without any major overhaul? A few years back I had similar problem when Palm PDA went belly up and I had to find a replacement. I do very little image editing with the exception of cropping and increasing fill-lighting. Then I edit captions and move to new folders, as well as cherry picking good shots into various albums. Within Picasa, I resize resolutions, export them and replace them in the same folder. Remarkable - I do the exact same steps!! I always copy new images to one same folder so that Folder Manager only has to scan 1 folder. I will occasionally edit an image using some other program.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |